The WSJ chart above shows our dismal ranking among world producers of electricity from nuclear energy. We can and should focus on nuclear as a reliable base load source of electricity which solar and wind cannot now provide.
"...The likely launch of the next generation of nuclear reactors -- a move in the making for at least a decade -- has big implications for the economy and the environment. Expanding the use of nuclear power has the potential to make a significant dent in emissions of carbon dioxide, the most commonly produced greenhouse gas. And Energy Secretary Stephen Chu has made nuclear power an agency priority. [Good news!]
The first round of building would add about seven new reactors to the U.S.'s existing fleet of 104 at a likely cost of more than $40 billion. But the new plants cost so much -- estimates range from $5 billion to $12 billion -- that power companies could have trouble coming up with the equity they must put into the projects, typically 20% to 50% of the total. In addition, technical or regulatory problems could arise, and it isn't certain the plants can be run profitably..."
1 comment:
What insanity to not have been developing nuclear plants in the US all these years.
Post a Comment