My least favorite NY Times columnist, Maureen Dowd, skewers Hillary thus:
"Hillary's problem isn't that she's angry. It's that she's not angry enough. From Iraq to Katrina and the assault on the Constitution, from Schiavo to Alito and N.S.A. snooping to Congressional corruption, Hillary has failed to lead in voicing outrage. She's been too busy triangulating and calculating to be good at articulating.
The Republicans can't marginalize Hillary. She has already marginalized herself."
Yet, Dowd encourages Hillary to be angrier and lead at the same time; to be tougher and more an articulate leader. I don't think Hillary has it in her to become a different person. What you've seen is what she is.
No comments:
Post a Comment