Fractals of Change: Weakness Invites Attack
Evslin is basically right.
Continued smart use of force is/will be necessary in this war to prevent the Radical Islamic Terrorists (RATs) from gaining control of nuclear weapons and for the reasons he cites. This war is not against nation-states. It's against a religious belief system, waged by RATs who want us dead or Islamic. Neither is an acceptable choice.
Critics such as Anon E. Mous (commenting at Evslin's site) fail to offer any realistic alternative. "Understanding" is not a policy or a strategy. We do understand the RATs. What actions to take is legitimately open to debate.
The leftist propaganda machine fails to generate anything but smoke and criticism. I'll listen attentively when they offer realistic alternatives to the PMO.
The best policy we have, The National Security Policy of the United States, is described here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf
Let's hear from those who disagree how they would change it. Criticism without proposing a different policy is abdicating responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment