The Senate Race in Connecticut - New York Times
As would be expected, the New York Times has endorsed Mr. Lamont for Senator over Mr. Lieberman. Once again they show their ultra-liberal stripes and, as is more often than not the case these days, are wrong. The liberals have consistently failed to offer an alternative to President Bush's strategy to defeat terrorists.
They are quick to criticize, but slow to step up to the reality we face in the world from the RATs (Radical Islamic Terrorists). They simply have no plan beyond bashing Bush .
Joe Lieberman is a decent man who understands the world we face and he is Connecticut's best alternative for the Senate. The polls show that be will be elected. That's good news.
I am happy to evaluate an alternative strategy to defeat RATs, but the radical liberals do not have one.
I will not vote for a candidate/party who/which offers criticism without alternatives.
No comments:
Post a Comment