Walter Cronkite, certainly one of the most respected names in recent journalism, defines himself and others in his profession as liberal. Based on his definition of the term. I think he's right. However his piece suggests that the inequalities of our society which most journalists in our society encounter when they are young in their careers results in their beliefs and biases which seems to be OK with him.
His take on TV journalism is interesting, but more time for the news reporters to present both sides seems unlikely in our sound bite society, which he neglects to note is an outcome of the TV media.
++++++
"I believe that most of us reporters are liberal, but not because we consciously have chosen that particular color in the political spectrum. More likely it is because most of us served our journalistic apprenticeships as reporters covering the seamier side of our cities -- the crimes, the tenement fires, the homeless and the hungry, the underclothed and undereducated.
We reached our intellectual adulthood with daily close-ups of the inequality in a nation that was founded on the commitment to equality for all. So we are inclined to side with the powerless rather than the powerful. If that is what makes us liberals so be it, just as long as in reporting the news we adhere to the first ideals of good journalism -- that news reports must be fair, accurate and unbiased. That clearly doesn't apply when one deserts the front page for the editorial page and the columns to which opinion should be isolated.
The perceived liberalism of television reporters, I am convinced, is a product of the limited time given for any particular item. The reporter desperately tries to get all the important facts and essential viewpoints into his or her piece but, against a fast-approaching deadline, he or she must summarize in a sentence the complicated story. That is where the slippage occurs, and the summary too frequently, without intention, seems to emphasize one side or the other."
No comments:
Post a Comment