At the Times, a Scoop Deferred

At the Times, a Scoop Deferred

This Washington Post article demonstrates the depth of concern within the print media establishment about 'who does it best.'

The Times has serious questions to answer about its timing (coinciding with the Patriot Act renewal vote in the Senate and a book by the Times reporter to be published in January) of this story.

I think we're seeing a major U.S. newspaper sliding down the slippery slope of politics choosing to be a tool for this country's liberal anti-Bush factions. This is their right, of course, but beneath the ideals that should guide a great newspaper. 'ALL the News that's Fit to Print'

I can't help but conclude that Times' anti-war/anti-Administration stance does not serve the country's national security interests.