What intrigue the NY Times tries to create! Because the Times took a different position than Time Magazine on this 'freedom of the press to protect anonymous sources" affair even when it appears a crime has been committed, the Times intends to create what appears to be a false impression that Rove was the source of the leak. The Times refuses to let the story die and the liberal media is in a feeding frenzy over this.
This story suggests that Rove did not leak the name of the CIA agent to Novak or any other reporter. If that's the case, why such a big deal? Novak is the person the media should be focusing on, but apparently he will tell his press colleagues nothing.
The Christian Science Monitor has a piece explaining the basics of this issue.
Nevertheless, the Times is out for blood because of their hatred for the Bush administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment